We obtained two samples via the online crowdsourcing marketplace, Amazon
Mechanical Turk (MTurk). The first round of data collection occurred in the fall of 2013 (n =
215) and the second in spring of 2014 (n = 606); both included U.S. individuals only.
Participants in 2013 received $0.20 for participating in a 5-10 minute survey and participants in
2014 received $1.50 for participating in a 25-minute survey, which included additional measures
in addition to those used in 2013. Twenty-three individuals participated in both rounds of data
collection; thus, their later entry was removed. Seven participants (3.2% of 215) of 2013 who
worked on the study for less than 90 seconds (average time taken was 195.44 seconds SD =
108.98) were excluded as inattention to research materials might undermine data quality (Rogge
& Maniaci, 2014). Similarly, thirteen participants (2.2% of 583) of 2014 who worked on the
study for less than three minutes (n = 6) and more than 40 minutes (n = 7) were excluded
(average time taken was 804.82 seconds SD = 422.65, or approximately 13 minutes). We then
removed an additional 37 individuals who failed the manipulation check. In total we excluded 57
participants (7.1%) of the overall sample. Note that 35% of all participants who fell outside of
the reasonable time window failed the manipulation check, whereas this was only the case for
4.8% of participants who completed the study within the expected time.
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61-83.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder