BS and Chivalry Links

http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1302229/chivalry_and_the_moderating_effect_of_ambivalent_sexism_individual_differences/

http://www.nerdyfeminist.com/2012/01/no-chivalry-thanks.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/16/poll-shows-mixed-feelings-about-feminism/print/

http://www.nas.org/articles/Chivalry_Lives_An_Interview_with_Blayne_Bennett

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/16/poll-shows-mixed-feelings-about-feminism/print/

AWESOME CRITICISM OF BENEVOLENT SEXISM ITEMS

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/200901/exploring-the-items-used-measure-benevolent-sexism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymNdfdQvdVc

http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/7/9/8/798c754bddbb20d9/PWQ35_3-2.mp3?c_id=6948448&expiration=1434966076&hwt=1763f99d454d137c88ef75243af7e88b

Cultural tightness and Honour are related

We note that previous research has found that the South and parts of the
Midwest can be characterized as honor cultures (1, 17–19). Consequently,
our regional rankings suggest that honor is positively
associated with tightness. This finding is theoretically consistent;
we would expect that honor cultures, by their nature, have strict
rules regarding expected behavior. Tightness, however, is a broader
construct than honor; although many honor cultures are tight, not
all tight cultures are honor oriented.

Harrington, J. R., & Gelfand, M. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990-7995.

Special Issue: Social Norms and Cultural Dynamics - SOCIAL EXCLUSION AND INCLUSION ARE EFFECTIVE IN PROMOTING NORMATIVE BEHAVIOR

Given the powerful psychological and behavioral ramifications, social inclusion and exclusion serve as effective ways to enforce normative behavior. For example, including helpful individuals and excluding unhelpful individuals shapes group socialization and norms over time (Levine, Moreland, & Hausmann, 2005). Congruently, the threat of ostracism is considered a fundamental mechanism of establishing a norm (Ouwerkerk, Kerr, Gallucci, & Van Lange, 2005) and actual ostracism has been shown to promote cooperation in groups (Feinberg, Willer, & Schultz, 2014). These findings suggest these strategies can be effective in promoting normative behavior, thus, influences on their utilization are crucial topics of study. Despite these findings, there is a paucity of research about their utilization across contexts with different levels of job mobility. In the next section, we discuss why culture and job mobility might hold such an influential position in the use of social inclusion and exclusion.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597814000648#


norm-upholders vs. norm-violators.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07495978/129