Sample regression and simple slopes table and Interesting Results Reporting for non-significant simple slopes for high honor-oriented men

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916309485


O'Dea, C. J., Bueno, A. M. C., & Saucier, D. A. (2017). Fight or flight: Perceptions of men who confront versus ignore threats to themselves and others. Personality and individual differences, 104, 345-351.

We also examined whether the association between condition and manly and non-manly perceptions of the man in the vignette depended on participants' level of MHBS. For each of these models (manly or non-manly perceptions), a centered composite calculation of MHBS, condition (coded as chooses to walk away = 0, chooses to fight = 1), and the MHBS × condition product term carrying the interaction were entered as predictors in a regression analysis. We will discuss the manly and non-manly dependent variables separately in the following sections.

6.1. Manly perceptions

The regression model testing the effects of MHBS, condition, and their interaction on manly perceptions of the man in the vignette is presented in Table 2. There was a significant MHBS × condition interaction predicting manly perceptions of the man in the vignette. Specifically, there was a significant effect of condition projected at one standard deviation below the mean on MHBS such that men who chose to fight were perceived significantly less manly than men who chose to walk away. However, consistent with our hypotheses, as levels of MHBS increased, so did manly perceptions of the man who chose to fight, while manly perceptions of the man who chose to walk away declined. As such, there was no significant effect of condition on manly perceptions of the man in the vignette projected at one standard deviation above the mean on MHBS.

Easy Research Idea: Honor Culture Endorsement and Hostile Attribution Bias

Vignettes are from these researchers:

Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 713-722.

Calvete, E., Orue, I., Gamez-Guadix, M., & López de Arroyabe, E. (2016). Social information processing in dating conflicts: Reciprocal relationships with dating aggression in a one-year prospective study. Journal of interpersonal violence, 31(7), 1159-1183.

Instructions about how to save IRB approval and submission forms from ISU

IRB SUBMISSION FORM:

When you are inside the xForm, there should be a button at the bottom that says “more.” Clicking it should give you the option to create and download a pdf with or without attachments.

In case you do not know how to get to the xForm after it’s approved, here are more specific instructions:

1. Locate the study you want to open from the list of your studies on your dashboard (the screen you see when you log in).
2. Open the study by clicking the blue IRB ID.
3. Once inside the study, locate the event (the continuing review and/or modification you want) and click the link.

·         Events are listed in the fourth table down, after “study,” “study-site,” and “contacts.”

4. Once inside the event, look to the left for a column entitled “Actions.” There should be a link called “xForms” with a number in parentheses behind it. Click that.
5. A new window should open with a link that reads “IRB Application.” This link will open the completed form.
6. At the bottom of the form, you should see a “More” button that will allow you to view the form as a PDF that you should then be able to download and print.

IRB APPROVAL LETTER:

Approval letters are documents generated by IRB Manager at the resolution of each event (e.g., initial application, modification, continuing review). 

The “Attachments” field within every event has two sections:

1.       general “attachments” (containing documents uploaded within the IRB Manager application)

2.       “generated docs” (the approval letter)

MPLUS syntax

If we don't want a correlation between the variables, we add this @0 like that:

Honor1 with Honor2@0;

In the output the correlation between Honor 1 and Honor2 should be 0.0000


@1 would set the correlation to 1
@2 would set the correlation to 2
and so on...


This syntax numbers in parenthesis would mean you are setting the correlation coefficients to be the same:

Honor1 with Honor2(0);
Honor2 with Honor3(0);

Honor5 with Honor6(1);
Honor4 with Honor5(1);


In the output, you should see that the correlation coefficients to be the same for Honor1 and Honor2 and for Honor2 and Honor 3.

You can put any number you want inside the paranthesis.

With Susan - Positive or Negative Reciprocity behaviors - Which one is more important in honor cultures?

People in honor cultures may tend to be higher on negative reciprocity behaviors (paying back the bad deeds, retaliation) than positive reciprocity behaviors because losing honor is more costly than gaining honor?

A single paper can be done on this!

vocabulary "conducive"

conducive = tending to produce; contributive; helpful; favorable (usually followed by to):

"Ideologies and environmental threats also help shape group norms that are conducive to violent self-sacrifice."

Elnakouri, A., McGregor, I., & Grossmann, I. (in press). Dying for the group: Towards a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. [commentary] [link]

Personal Website

http://kremslab.strikingly.com/#what-we-do

http://www.joshtybur.com/

https://www.strikingly.com

https://www.gamzegulez.com

https://www.aslicansunar.com/vita

http://www.pelingul.com or gulpelin or pgul or pelin.gul or pelin-gul or pelin_gul or drpelingul